USPTO serial 75349433
IPORT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KRISP, JENNIFER MARIE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with IPORT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Diego, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN CLARKE HOLMAN
JOHN CLARKE HOLMAN JACOBSON PRICE HOLMAN & STERN PLLC400 7TH ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20004-2237UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software and access jacks for providing access to global computer or information networks from hotels, motels, inns, lodges, hospital rooms, condominium and apartment buildings and complexes, multiple dwelling units and other public housing accommodations | ACTIVE | Dec 1, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 27, 2001 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jul 30, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 11, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 11, 1999 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 5, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 25, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 25, 1998 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 22, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 11, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 21, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 14, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |