USPTO serial 75349603
Q IT CORP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 12, 2002
- Examiner
- CAIN, CATHERINE P
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with Q IT CORP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Frank Gambale
2601 HOLLYRIDGE DRLOS ANGELES, CA 90068UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Audio/visual production services and associated programming for a multi-media global positioning system and software design therefor | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 2, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 20, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 15, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 12, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 19, 2002 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 18, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 16, 2002 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 29, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2002 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Mar 7, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 27, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 14, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 23, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 14, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 29, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 7, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 5, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 3, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 14, 1999 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 24, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 18, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 10, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 10, 1999 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Mar 4, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 19, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 2, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 22, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |