USPTO serial 75352603
TIMBER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LOBO, DEBORAH E
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TIMBER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Twycross Warks, CV9 3PJ, GB
Twycross Warks, CV9 3PJ, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JERALD E NAGAE
WILLIAM O FERRON JR SEED INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW GROUP PLLSTE 6300701 FIFTH AVESEATTLE, WA 98104-7092Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | articulated and nonarticulated dolls; bendable toys; play figures; board games; carrying cases for toys; decorative wind socks; electronic toys with a clock or time piece feature; card games; hand-held pinball games; hand-held units for playing electronic games; kites; nonelectric hand-held skill games; toy stuffed, plush and cloth animals, puppets, dolls; skill and action games; wind-up toys; toy action figures; toy balloons; toy banks; jigsaw puzzles; cube puzzles; manipulative puzzles; toy vehicles; toy whistles; hand-held units with a visual display for playing electronic games that simulate a pet; and yo-yos | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 11, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 26, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 21, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 1, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 5, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 20, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 10, 1999 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 11, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 9, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 25, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 15, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 20, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 1998 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 6, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 6, 1998 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 6, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 29, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |