Drawing for TOTAL ENERGY

USPTO serial 75352844

TOTAL ENERGY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
MICHELI, ANGELA M
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TOTAL ENERGY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ned W. Branthover

LAWRENCE E ABELMAN ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB666 3RD AVENEW YORK, NY 10017-5621UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035distributorships featuring natural gas liquids and natural gas, heating oil, coal, propane and electricity to commercial, residential and governmental end-users and distributors to end-usersACTIVE
036brokerage of energyACTIVE
039distribution of natural gas liquids and natural gas, heating oils, coal, propane and electricity to commercial, residential and governmental end-users and distributors to end-usersACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 13, 2007MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Nov 13, 2007ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Nov 13, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Aug 29, 2007EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED
Mar 27, 2007GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED
Mar 27, 2007CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED
Jan 29, 2007JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Mar 3, 2006CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Feb 7, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Feb 9, 2005EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Feb 8, 2005EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Jul 29, 2004CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED
Oct 16, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Dec 10, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Sep 6, 2002REINREINSTATED
Apr 8, 2002PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Apr 3, 2002ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 2, 2001CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED
Sep 20, 2000CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Aug 7, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 25, 2000CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED
Jul 15, 1999CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Feb 19, 1999CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 11, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 12, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 8, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 29, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance