USPTO serial 75353834
DIGITAL DNA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WINTER, ELIZABETH
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DIGITAL DNA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN M CARSON
JOHN M CARSON KNOBBE MARTENS OLSON & BEAR LLP620 NEWPORT CTR DR 16TH FLNEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE IN AUDITING USAGE OF INFORMATION, NAMELY, DETERMINING THE DURATION OF USE OF THE INFORMATION, THE NUMBER OF USES OF THE INFORMATION, AND THE TYPES OF USAGE OF THE INFORMATION WHICH IS ADAPTED FOR USE ON GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORKS AND ON MAGNETIC, ELECTRONIC OR DIGITAL DATA STORAGE MEDIA, NAMELY, CD-ROMS, HARD DISK DRIVES, FLOPPY DISKS AND THE LIKE | ACTIVE | Jun 15, 1997 |
| 035 | BUSINESS SERVICES, NAMELY, CONTROLLING USER ACCESS TO DIGITIZED DATA, PROVIDING AUDIT INFORMATION FOR ACCESSED DIGITIZED DATA, AND BILLING FOR ACCESS TO DATA | ACTIVE | Jul 28, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 21, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 18, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 11, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 13, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 10, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 15, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 1, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 22, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 14, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 4, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 17, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |