USPTO serial 75354127
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Whippany, NJ
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael J. Calvey
MICHAEL J CALVEY SOKOLOW DUNAUD MERCADIER & CARRERAS770 LEXINGTON AVE FL 6NEW YORK, NY 10021-8165UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | printed publications, namely, magazines, featuring adult entertainment | ACTIVE | Aug 1, 1997 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 19, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 19, 2004 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 19, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 28, 2004 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 28, 2004 | EXAR | EXPARTE APPEAL AFFIRMED/REVERSED IN PART | — |
| Oct 14, 2003 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 14, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 16, 2003 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| May 8, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 8, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 7, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 25, 2002 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 25, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 18, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 18, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 11, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 11, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 1999 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 7, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 9, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 25, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 9, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 9, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 7, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 5, 1998 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 5, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 19, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 5, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 5, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 2, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |