Drawing for WHITEHOUSE:

USPTO serial 75354127

WHITEHOUSE:

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
MADDEN, ANNE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - DOCKET CLERK

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WHITEHOUSE:?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael J. Calvey

MICHAEL J CALVEY SOKOLOW DUNAUD MERCADIER & CARRERAS770 LEXINGTON AVE FL 6NEW YORK, NY 10021-8165UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016printed publications, namely, magazines, featuring adult entertainmentACTIVEAug 1, 1997

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 19, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Nov 19, 2004MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Nov 19, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 28, 2004ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
May 28, 2004EXAREXPARTE APPEAL AFFIRMED/REVERSED IN PART
Oct 14, 2003CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED
Aug 22, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Aug 14, 2003JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Jul 16, 2003EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF
May 8, 2003EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
May 8, 2003EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
May 7, 2003EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Nov 25, 2002UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED
Nov 25, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Nov 15, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Sep 18, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 18, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 11, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 11, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 9, 1999ZZZYPREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN
Dec 7, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 9, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 25, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 9, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 9, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 7, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 5, 1998ZZZYPREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN
Aug 5, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 19, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 5, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 5, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 2, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance