USPTO serial 75356595
NEU-SENSAMIDE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUSH, KAREN K
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NEU-SENSAMIDE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
S-223 70 Lund, SE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LINDA L BERKOWITZ
LINDA L BERKOWITZ LADAS & PARRY26 W 61 STNEW YORK, NY 10023-7604UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | chemical and pharmaceutical substances for human and veterinary medical use, namely, antiemetics and chemical and pharmaceutical preparations for the treatment of cancer; food for babies; medical plasters; wound dressings; material for stopping teeth; dental wax; all purpose disinfectants; preparations for destroying vermin | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 27, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 22, 2000 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 5, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 4, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 5, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 27, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |