USPTO serial 75358380
INTEGRATED SYSTEMS CONSULTING GROUP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HOWARD, CHERYL L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with INTEGRATED SYSTEMS CONSULTING GROUP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | computer consulting services, namely, consulting in the area of software applications development and systems and network management | ABANDONED | Jul 30, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ISCG Investment Company, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by ISCG Investment Company, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by ISCG Investment Company, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named INTEGRATED SYSTEMS CONSULTING GROUP
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 27, 2002 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 27, 2002 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 27, 2002 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 15, 2002 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 6, 2000 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 6, 2000 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 6, 2000 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 12, 2000 | CRTP | REG. CANCELLED - RESTORED TO PENDENCY | — |
| Apr 19, 2000 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 7, 1999 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 14, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 13, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 30, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 8, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 1, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 13, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 8, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 2, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |