USPTO serial 75359289
FIESTA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BLANDU, FLORENTINA
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FIESTA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROBERT E BROWNE
ROBERT E BROWNE NEAL, GERBER & EISENBERG LLP2 N LASALLE ST STE 2200CHICAGO, IL 60602UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | plastic cups and glasses | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 29, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 17, 2006 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 16, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 16, 2006 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 16, 2006 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 16, 2006 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 17, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 17, 2005 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 27, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 7, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 31, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 31, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 14, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 14, 2005 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 27, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 29, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 26, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 13, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 7, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 15, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 12, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 12, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 11, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 5, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 1999 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 21, 1999 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 30, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 8, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 13, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |