USPTO serial 75359347
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
BELTSVILLE, MD
Bala Cynwyd, PA
Bala Cynwyd, PA
Bala Cynwyd, PA
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for use in digital imaging, namely, software for general use in scanning, indexing, archiving and retrieving documents; and document management systems comprising, scanners, compact disks, CD jukeboxes, computers, facsimile machines and micrographic readers and printers; and supplies, namely, blank computer discs and microfilm | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 1, 1998 |
| 035 | Integrated data base management services; data processing services, namely, data indexing | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 9, 1998 |
| 040 | PHYSICAL CONVERSION OF DIGITAL, MICROGRAPHICS AND PAPER DATA FROM ONE MEDIUM TO ANOTHER | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 9, 1998 |
| 042 | COMPUTER CONSULTATION IN THE FIELD OF DOCUMENT MANAGEMENT | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 9, 1998 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 29, 2021 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Dec 26, 2019 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2011 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Dec 31, 2010 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Dec 31, 2010 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Dec 22, 2010 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 23, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 23, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 26, 2007 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Dec 26, 2006 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Dec 26, 2006 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 26, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 24, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 12, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 8, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 1, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 26, 2000 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 22, 2000 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 21, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 10, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 28, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 6, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 2, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 27, 1999 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 24, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 24, 1999 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 24, 1999 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 23, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 19, 1998 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 6, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 30, 1998 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 18, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 7, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 17, 1998 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |