USPTO serial 75360841
HR HOLT RENFREW
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SONNEBORN, TRICIA L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HR HOLT RENFREW?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario M4W 3B8, CA
Toronto, Ontario M4W 3B8, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | HOUSE MARK FOR A FULL LINE OF NON-MEDICATED COSMETICS, TOILETRIES, NAMELY, COSMETIC COMPACTS, COSMETIC PENCILS, FACIAL MAKEUP, FOOT SCRUB LOTION, BODY POWDER, SOAP, EAU DE TOILETTE, EAU DE PERFUME, EAU DE COLOGNE, PERFUME, BATH GEL, MILK BATH, BODY LOTION, BODY CREAM, BATH CRYSTALS, BATH SALTS; SKIN CARE PREPARATIONS, NAIL CARE PREPARATIONS, HAIR CARE PREPARATIONS, PERFUMERY, BATH AND SHOWER PREPARATIONS, BODY CARE PREPARATIONS AND SUN CARE PREPARATIONS; COSMETIC PADS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 3, 2002 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 3, 2002 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 3, 2002 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 5, 2001 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 26, 2000 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 27, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 26, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 5, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 22, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 22, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 19, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 6, 1999 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 6, 1999 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 1, 1999 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 14, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 17, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 17, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 13, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |