USPTO serial 75364437
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Retail store services featuring food and beverages, auto parts, automobiles, clothing, chemical products, electronics, home appliances, and machines and equipment | ACTIVE | Jan 8, 1997 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 26, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 22, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 16, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 4, 2001 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 13, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 9, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 31, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 21, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 19, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 10, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 26, 1999 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 22, 1999 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 22, 1999 | PRIM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 1999 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 24, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 9, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |