USPTO serial 75364701
BABY CHICKS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GAST, PAUL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BABY CHICKS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Parnell, Auckland, NZ
Parnell, Auckland, NZ
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | baby bunting, pants, bandanas, beach coverups, beach wear, cloth bibs, blouses, blousons, bonnets, bottoms, cardigans, over coats, half coats, rain coats, dresses, infantwear, jerseys, jumpers, layettes, leggings, nightgown, neckties, neckwear, pajamas, play suits, pullovers, rompers, scarves, shirts, shorts, short sets, consisting of shirt and shorts, skirts, sleepwear, sweaters, clothing tops, t-shirts, trousers, under shirts, under pants, vests | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 28, 2001 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 14, 2001 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 17, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 7, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 3, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 15, 2000 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 15, 2000 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2000 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 15, 2000 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 14, 1999 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 15, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 23, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 19, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 5, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 30, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 18, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 15, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 20, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 12, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |