USPTO serial 75365283
ESSENTIAL GRANDPARENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2500608Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 23, 2001
- Examiner
- KON, ELISSA GARBER
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ESSENTIAL GRANDPARENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Santa Barbara, CA
Santa Barbara, CA
Santa Barbara, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christine L. Kopitzke
Christine L. Kopitzke SoCal IP Law Group LLP735 State Street Suite 211SANTA BARBARA, CA 93101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Books, and printed teaching, instructional and educational materials, all in the field of topics of general interest to grandparents, parents and families | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 1, 1996 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 6, 2022 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Oct 23, 2020 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2011 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Oct 22, 2011 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Oct 21, 2011 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 1, 2007 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Oct 29, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 22, 2007 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 29, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 23, 2001 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 15, 2001 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 29, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 21, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 16, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 30, 2001 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 13, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2000 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 6, 2000 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2000 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 13, 2000 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 4, 1999 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 8, 1999 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 24, 1999 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 15, 1999 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 13, 1999 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 10, 1999 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 10, 1999 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 13, 1999 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 13, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 21, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 19, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 20, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 18, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 13, 1998 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 8, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 7, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |