USPTO serial 75366180
NATURAL 10
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLYBURN, CARLA DIONNE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NATURAL 10?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
BEVERLY HILLS, CA
BEVERLY HILLS, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | PRE-RECORDED VIDEO CASSETTES AND VIDEO DISKS FEATURING BEAUTY CONTESTS, ADULT ENTERTAINMENT, FEMALE MODELS, FITNESS AND EXERCISE, DANCING, AND INTERVIEWS; SUNGLASSES AND EYEGLASSES; INTERACTIVE VIDEO GAMES AND COMPUTER GAMES | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | MAGAZINES FEATURING BEAUTY CONTEST, ADULT ENTERTAINMENT, PICTURES OF FEMALE MODELS, DANCING, INTERVIEWS, FICTION, AND ARTICLES ON HUMAN RELATIONS, SPORTS, ENTERTAINMENT, LIFESTYLES, AND FITNESS AND EXERCISE; BOOKS FEATURING BEAUTY CONTESTS, ADULT ENTERTAINMENT, PICTURES OF FEMALE MODELS, DANCING, INTERVIEWS, FICTION, AND ARTICLES ON HUMAN RELATIONS, SPORTS, ENTERTAINMENT, LIFESTYLES, AND FITNESS AND EXERCISE; CALENDARS; MOUNTED AND UNMOUNTED PHOTOGRAPHS; STATIONERY, NAMELY, POST CARDS, NOTE CARDS, AND WRITING PAPTE; PLAYING CARDS CARDS; AND PAPER BATH MATS AND PAPTE PAPER PLACE MATS | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES IN THE NATURE OF ADULT ENTERTAINMENT, BEAUTY CONTESTS, PICTURES OF FEMALE MODELS, INTERVIEWS, FICTION, AND ARTICLES ON HUMAN RELATIONS, SPORTS, ENTERTAINMENT, LIFESTYLES, AND FITNESS, ALL PROVIDED VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES IN THE NATURE OF BEAUTY CONTESTS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 23, 2019 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 27, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 27, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 29, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 16, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 15, 2002 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 3, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 28, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 2, 2002 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 2, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 4, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 2, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 26, 2000 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 30, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 12, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 10, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 11, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 7, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 16, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 16, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 2, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 1, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 4, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 24, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 12, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |