USPTO serial 75374493
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CHARLES T GRAHAM
P BONDIE AIRSPORT TECHNOLOGY, LLC2529 BRASSOW RDSALINAS, MI 48176UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | air pads for comfort and protection fitted for use in helmets | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 22, 2002 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 22, 2002 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 22, 2002 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 11, 2000 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 18, 1999 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 14, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 13, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 6, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 30, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 1999 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 12, 1999 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 12, 1999 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 4, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 4, 1999 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 4, 1999 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 4, 1999 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 30, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 10, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |