USPTO serial 75380527
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RUTH MEGER
RUTH MEGER TRADEMARK CONSULTANT4000 PHEASANT RIDGE DRMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55449UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Hair care preparations namely, shampoos, conditioners, spray and sculpting gels, hair color, and waving lotion; skin care preparations, namely, moisturizers, toners, skin cleaning creams, skin cleaning lotions, skin cleaning gels, body and facial lotions, facial and body cream masks, facial and body powder masks and astringents for cosmetic purposes; cosmetics namely, lipstick, eyeshadow, foundation cream, blushes, face powder, concealer, eye pencils, lip pencils an mascara; personal hygiene preparation, namely, total body cleaning liquid gels, toilet ware, perfumes and colognes, massage oils and lotions, skin emollients, moisturizing body oils and lotions; and household cleaning preparations, namely, all purpose cleaning preparations, cleaners for use on dishes, cleaners for use on fabric, and cleaners for use on floors, walls, windows and toilets | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 1, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 7, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 2, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 30, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |