USPTO serial 75382570
MINIBORE.COM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GOLDEN, JAMES B
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MINIBORE.COM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sherry L. Rollo
Sherry L. Rollo Hahn, Loeser & Parks LLP125 S Wacker Dr., 2900Chicago, IL 60606UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | providing general information concerning products and their selection and use in the field of boring tools for use with machine tools via a computer global network | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 7, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 7, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 15, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 23, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 18, 2001 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 18, 2001 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 18, 2001 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Sep 27, 2000 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 3, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 14, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 6, 2000 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 18, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 24, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 26, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 29, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 31, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 21, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 21, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 10, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |