USPTO serial 75386664
SKYWAVE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EVANKO, PATRICIA MALESARDI
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SKYWAVE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
THEODORE R PAULDING
THEODORE R PAULDING CITYPLACE IIMCCORMICK PAULDING & HUBER LLP185 ASYLUM STHARTFORD, CT 06103Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Wireless telephone accessories, namely, antennas, batteries, battery base plates, battery chargers and savers, cables, car speakers, cases, cords, cradles, mounts, holders, modems, and data interfaces comprised of cables and adapters, facsimile machines, global positioning satellite tracking receivers and displays, automotive navigational systems comprised of global positioning satellite transponders, receivers, display units and processors, wireless pagers, coin-operated pay telephones, telephones, power cords and two-way radios; portable computers and accessories therefore, namely, modems, PCMCIA cards, cases, cords, pointing devices, and printers; computer software, namely, for electronic mail, for accessing global computer information networks, for use in database management, for use in telecommunications management, transformers, microphones, amplifiers, speakers, mounts, connectors, cords | ABANDONED | Apr 2, 1996 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 17, 2003 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 17, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 17, 2003 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 4, 2001 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 30, 2001 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 27, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 14, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 20, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 20, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 12, 2001 | EXPR | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED | — |
| May 26, 2000 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 14, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 13, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 18, 1999 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 19, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 12, 1999 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 31, 1999 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 26, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 23, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 31, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 30, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 15, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |