Drawing for UNTOUCHABLES

USPTO serial 75386786

UNTOUCHABLES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
REIHNER, DAVID
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with UNTOUCHABLES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MICHAEL S SHERMAN

MICHAEL S SHERMAN JEFFER MANGELS BUTLER & MARMARO LLP1900 AVE OF THE STARS 7TH FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90067-4308UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028TOYS, GAMES, PLAYTHINGS, AND SPORTING GOODS THAT ARE SOLD OR DISTRIBUTED IN CHANNELS OF COMMERCE IN WHICH SOUVENIRS, COLLECTIBLES, ACCESSORIES AND PROMOTIONAL MATERIALS FOR MOTOR CAR RACING ARE OFFERED, SOLD OR DISTRIBUTED, NAMELY, TOY RACE CAR DRIVER HELMETS; TOY VEHICLES, NAMELY, RACE CARS; MODEL RACE CAR KITS; DIE CAST TOY RACE CARS; TOY FIGURES AND FIGURINES OF RACE CAR DRIVERS, RACE CAR CREW MEMBERS AND ACCESSORIES THEREFOR; SPORTS GOGGLES FOR USE IN RACING VEHICLES; HOBBY CRAFT RACE CAR DRIVER DOLL AND FIGURINE KITS COMPOSED OF PLASTIC, VINYL AND RESIN MOLDS; WIND-UP TOY RACE CARS; ACTION SKILL CAR RACING GAMES; RACE CAR BOARD GAMES; RACE CAR CARD GAMES; JIGSAW AND MANIPULATIVE PUZZLES FEATURING CAR RACING AND RACE CAR DRIVERS; MECHANICAL TOY RACE CARS; BATTERY-OPERATED TOY RACE CARS; RACE CAR DRIVER DOLLS AND PUPPETS AND ACCESSORIES THEREFOR; RIDE ON TOY RACE CARSACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 8, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 12, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Nov 5, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 13, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 13, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 24, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
May 20, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Mar 10, 1999CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Nov 2, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 30, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 10, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 11, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 10, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance