USPTO serial 75396461
VEDA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BENMAMAN, ALICE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VEDA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John R. Harris
JOHN R HARRIS MORRIS, MANNING & MARTIN, LLP1600 ATLANTA FINANCIAL CTR3343 PEACHTREE RD NEATLANTA, GA 30326Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer programs and documentation sold as a unit therewith for searching, gathering, manipulating, organizing, consolidating, validating, merging, summarizing and reporting data and text information obtained from a global computer network, knowledge bases and/or electronic information sources | ACTIVE | Mar 9, 1999 |
| 042 | Providing a search engine for research in a wide variety of areas which incorporates the following features, namely, researching numerous sources of information on a global computer information network; verifying results prior to reporting to the user to ensure all are still relevant; providing custom summaries based specifically on what the user is researching; editing out information links that are no longer or temporarily unavailable; storing the research, allowing the user to review, reuse, and refine the requests; keeping and organizing the research and results for later access your work from any location; and, provide periodic updates on the research, if desired | ACTIVE | Mar 9, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 8, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 13, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 17, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 5, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 3, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 12, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 4, 2001 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 23, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 18, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 19, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 20, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 14, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 14, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 22, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 21, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 15, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 4, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |