USPTO serial 75398866
SHAKESPEARES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CROCKETT, CYNTHIA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SHAKESPEARES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Santa Monica, CA
Santa Monica, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MITCHELL E RADIN
MITCHELL E RADIN COWAN DEBAETS ABRAHAMS & SHEPPARD LLP41 MADISON AVE 34TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10010UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | PIES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 17, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 30, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 30, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 10, 2002 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Jun 10, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 9, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 26, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 10, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 17, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 23, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 26, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 4, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 3, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 3, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 3, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 28, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 30, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 24, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 24, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 20, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |