USPTO serial 75406432
MIRTILLO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SUK, HAE P
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MIRTILLO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Maglificio Barbara S.a.S. di Magni Sergio & C.
21052 BUSTO ARSIZIO (VARESE), IT
Other trademarks owned by Maglificio Barbara S.a.S. di Magni Sergio & C.
Maglificio Barbara S.a.S. di Magni Sergio & C.
21052 BUSTO ARSIZIO (VARESE), IT
Other trademarks owned by Maglificio Barbara S.a.S. di Magni Sergio & C.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RALPH E BUCKNAM
RALPH E BUCKNAM BUCKNAM AND ARCHER600 OLD COUNTRY RDGARDEN CITY, NY 11530-2001UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | men, women and children's clothing, namely, suits made of leather; shirts; blouses; skirts; jackets; trousers; shorts; vests; jerseys; pajamas; shoes; stockings; singlets, corsets; garters; pants; petty-coats; slippers; foot-wear in general; hats; scarves; foulards; neck-ties; rain-coats; overcoats; great coats; bathing suits; sports overalls; wind resistant jackets; ski-pants; belts; fur coats; fur jackets; fur pelts; fur stoles | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 25, 2002 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 25, 2002 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 25, 2002 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 15, 2000 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 11, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 10, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 27, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 26, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 24, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 11, 1998 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Dec 11, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 27, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 19, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 4, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |