Drawing for INDUSTRY

USPTO serial 75408121

INDUSTRY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
CORDOVA, RAUL
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INDUSTRY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JILL M PIETRINI

JILL M PIETRINI MANATT PHELPS & PHILLIPS11355 W OLYMPIC BLVDLOS ANGELES, CA 90064-1614UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041production and distribution of motion pictures, television programs in the fields of comedy, variety, drama, and news, production of television programs, and record production servicesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 1, 2000EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Aug 24, 2000EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF
Jun 12, 2000ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Apr 7, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 10, 2000JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Jan 10, 2000EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Jun 25, 1999CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 19, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 19, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 24, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 15, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 15, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 22, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 20, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance