USPTO serial 75408724
POD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ALT, JILL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with POD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Coral Gables, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAVID L HATTON
2250 SW 3RD AVE 5TH FLMIAMI, FL 33129UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 040 | design, production and development of multimedia software, Internet (web) sites, film and video production, print production, advertising and marketing development It will also be used in association with the creation of original content for the internet and multimedia arenas mostly within the field of entertainment, as well as other emerging interactive tech platforms, such as cable transmission | ACTIVE | Jan 5, 1995 |
| 042 | design, production and development of multimedia software, Internet (web) sites, film and video production, print production, advertising and marketing development It will also be used in association with the creation of original content for the internet and multimedia arenas mostly within the field of entertainment, as well as other emerging interactive tech platforms, such as cable transmission | ACTIVE | Jan 5, 1995 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 10, 1999 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Aug 25, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 24, 1999 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 12, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 10, 1999 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 10, 1999 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 17, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 7, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |