USPTO serial 75411004
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Anthony L. Meola
ANTHONY L MEOLA HOWREY SIMON ARNOLD & WHITE LLP1299 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NW BOX 34WASHINGTON, DC 20004-2402UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | sound recording and reproducing equipment, namely, dictating and transcribing machines; voice telephone answering apparatus; loggers; voice processors; word processors and text editing systems comprising external drives and memory cards; computer peripherals; sound recording media, namely, cassettes, tapes, cartridges, records, belts, foils, filaments flash memory cards; and discs; and parts and fittings for all the aforesaid goods; computer software for use therewith, which permits communication among memory module, computer hardware, and computer networks; and instructional manuals therefore sold as a unit | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 12, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 15, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 18, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 25, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 18, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 7, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 19, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 30, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 16, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 27, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 2000 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Apr 18, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 25, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 23, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 22, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 13, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 11, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 15, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 1, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |