USPTO serial 75411879
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CHARLES W HANOR
CHARLES W HANOR AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD LLP300 CONVENT ST STE 1500SAN ANTONIO, TX 78205UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Database software for database creation and management by selection of a plurality of files for inclusion into at least one selectable database, generation of a searchable index of the data contained in the selectable database for enabling a search to be performed of the searchable index to allow users to view, acquire, and generate single-data or multiple -data sources locally or remotely, and to allow users to compile, index, modify, and append the data sources according to default or user defined criteria and to allow for the capture of HTML data which is automatically indexed to locate and highlight specific text or groups of text designated by the user within the resulting database and for creating custom links to be defined between selected terms of selected files of selectable database | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 1, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 16, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 9, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 10, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 24, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 24, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 2, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 6, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |