Drawing for GOOD CENTS

USPTO serial 75412177

GOOD CENTS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
PERRY, KIMBERLY B
Law office
INTENT TO USE UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GOOD CENTS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MICHAEL D HOBBS JR

ARTHUR A GARDNER GARDNER GROFF PCSTE 800100 PARKWOOD POINT, 2018 POWERS FERRY RDATLANTA, GA 30339

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035retail store services related to home appliancesACTIVE
042Providing multiple-user access to a global computer information network for the transfer and dissemination of a wide range of informationACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 1, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 1, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 26, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Apr 29, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Apr 23, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Apr 19, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Apr 19, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 5, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Aug 1, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Aug 1, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 23, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
May 22, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Apr 22, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Apr 22, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 10, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Oct 22, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 20, 2002OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999
Aug 20, 2002OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999
Mar 2, 2000OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999
Sep 27, 1999ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
Aug 24, 1999PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 23, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Apr 29, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Apr 26, 1999CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED
Feb 13, 1999REINREINSTATED
Jan 24, 1999ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 2, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 2, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 30, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance