USPTO serial 75413469
URBAN BRANDS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2747468Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 5, 2003
- Examiner
- BENMAMAN, ALICE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with URBAN BRANDS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Secaucus, NJ
BUTTERFLY IP HOLDING CO., INC.
SECAUCUS, NJ
Secaucus, NJ
Secaucus, NJ
Secaucus, NJ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Florina A. Moldovan
Florina A. Moldovan McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter, LLP1300 Mount Kemble Avenue - PO Box 2075Morristown, NJ 07962UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | BUSINESS MANAGEMENT, CONSULTATION, PLANNING AND SUPERVISION SERVICES IN THE AREA OF RETAIL ESTABLISHMENTS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ASHLEY STEWART GROUP LTD, THE
- Other trademarks owned by BUTTERFLY IP HOLDING CO., INC.
- Other trademarks owned by URBAN BRANDS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by URBAN BRANDS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by URBAN BRANDS, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named URBAN BRANDS
- Prosecution event ARAA explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 9, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 9, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 19, 2014 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 7, 2014 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jan 9, 2013 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 12, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 12, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 3, 2010 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 15, 2009 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 7, 2009 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 4, 2009 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 30, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 5, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 5, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 17, 2003 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 8, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 25, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 20, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 17, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 5, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 12, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 4, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 13, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 29, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 28, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 29, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 15, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 12, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 31, 2000 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 25, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 6, 1999 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 5, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 26, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 26, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |