USPTO serial 75414119
HOP UP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2411028Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 5, 2000
- Examiner
- AYALA, LOURDES
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 100 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with HOP UP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sean P. Boutz
Sean P. Boutz Evans, Craven & Lackie, P.S.818 W Riverside Ave., Suite 250Spokane, WA 99201UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by HOP UP, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Hop Up Products LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Hop Up Products LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Hop Up Products LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Similar marks named HOP UP
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 20, 2023 | PCDE | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED | — |
| Mar 23, 2023 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Sep 20, 2022 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 22, 2022 | C8.T | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR) | — |
| Jul 21, 2022 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 20, 2022 | PCDE | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED | — |
| Jun 8, 2022 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| May 13, 2022 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jul 7, 2021 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 25, 2021 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 25, 2021 | PRAN | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED NO RESPONSE REQUIRED | — |
| May 14, 2021 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| May 3, 2021 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Apr 15, 2021 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Apr 15, 2021 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 15, 2021 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 15, 2021 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 15, 2021 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 15, 2021 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 9, 2021 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Mar 1, 2021 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 19, 2020 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 3, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 21, 2015 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 4, 2010 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Nov 4, 2010 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Oct 29, 2010 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2010 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 8, 2007 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| May 31, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| May 2, 2007 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| May 2, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 1, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 5, 2000 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 27, 2000 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 26, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 18, 2000 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 17, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 16, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 14, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 12, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 30, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 28, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 3, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 12, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 2, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 8, 1999 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Apr 9, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 31, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 22, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |