USPTO serial 75415956
LE CHURRO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 17, 2001
- Examiner
- FOSDICK, GEOFFREY A
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with LE CHURRO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KEN J. PEDERSEN
KEN J PEDERSEN PEDERSON & COMPANY PLLCP O BOX 2666BOISE, ID 83701-2666UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | pre-formed and frozen pastries, frozen pastry dough, and fried pastries filled or topped with fruit, honey, butter, cream cheese or caramel | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 4, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 19, 2008 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 26, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 17, 2001 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Feb 13, 2001 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 8, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2001 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 31, 2001 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 6, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 2, 2000 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 21, 1999 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 1999 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 12, 1999 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 1, 1999 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 19, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 14, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 15, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 3, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |