Drawing for SOLVETECH

USPTO serial 75418417

SOLVETECH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
DE JONGE, KATHLEEN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with SOLVETECH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

KIRK J DENIRO

KIRK J DENIRO FLIESLER DUBB MEYER & LOVEJOY LLP4 EMBARCADERO CTR STE 400SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-4156UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer hardware and software for retrieving and/or delivering medical information; computer hardware and software for reminding people of appointments and/or commitments; computer hardware, computer software and computer peripherals for utilizing multimedia and computer telephony to provide access to databases and perform data analysis; computer hardware, computer software and computer peripherals for analyzing data patterns; computer hardware, computer software and computer peripherals for utilizing artificial intelligence and/or expert systems to analyze data; computer hardware, computer software and computer peripherals for creating information databases and computer software for office and/or patient management that features cost containment and/or quality control; computer software for analyzing patterns of individuals; computer software for obtaining information from individuals and analyzing the obtained information; expert system software for managing patient information; computer software for use by individuals to aid personal creativity in brainstorming; computer software for discovering and/or analyzing patterns in data embodying expert systems and for creating expert systemsACTIVEJun 16, 2000
042Providing a computer database featuring medical information and/or appointment information; leasing computers for retrieving and/or delivering medical information; leasing computers for reminding people of appointments and/or commitments; providing a computer database utilizing multimedia and/or computer telephony in the fields of medical and patient-related information; providing an interactive computer database featuring medical information; providing a computer database featuring artificial intelligence and/or expert systems in the field of medical and patient-related information; custom software design for others; providing on-line information in the medical field regarding quality control, cost containment, patient histories and/or patient-related information; and, providing on-line computer information in the expert systems fieldACTIVEJun 16, 2000

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 1, 2001ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 7, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 5, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 30, 2000SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE
Aug 30, 2000EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Jun 28, 2000IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED
Jun 28, 2000EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Jan 4, 2000NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 12, 1999PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 10, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jun 7, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jun 1, 1999CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED
Apr 13, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 13, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 13, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 8, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance