USPTO serial 75418750
DNV RISK BASED MANAGEMENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STOIDES, KATHERINE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DNV RISK BASED MANAGEMENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
N-1322 HOVIK, NO
N-1322 HOVIK, NO
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LAWRENCE E ABELMAN
LAWRENCE E ABELMAN ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB150 E 42ND STNEW YORK, NY 10017-5612UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | BUSINESS MANAGEMENT IN THE FIELDS OF CLASSICATION, PRODUCT QUALITY CONTROL AND QUALITY ASSURANCE IN REAL ESTATE, AVIATION AND AEROSPACE, SHIPPING, RAILWAYS AND LAND VEHICLES | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | TECHNICAL SUPERVISION AND INSPECTION; SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH; COMPUTER PROGRAMMING FOR OTHERS; ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN; CALIBRATION IN THE NATURE OF MEASURING; CHEMICAL RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS; COMPUTER RENTAL; COMPUTER SOFTWARE DESIGN FOR OTHERS; CONSTRUCTION DRAFTING; SECURITY CONSULTATION SERVICES; INDUSTRIAL DESIGN; ENGINEERING DRAFTING; ENGINEERING; UNDERWATER EXPLORATION; GEOLOGICAL RESEARCH AND GEOLOGICAL SURVEYS; LAND SURVEYING; MATERIAL TESTING; MECHANICAL RESEARCH; OIL-FIELD SURVEYS; OIL-WELL TESTING; QUALITY CONTROL FOR OTHERS; RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT OF NEW PRODUCTS FOR OTHERS; ALL WITHIN THE FIELDS OF CLASSIFICATION, PRODUCT QUALITY CONTROL AND QUALITY ASSURANCE IN REAL ESTATE, AVIATION AND AEROSPACE, SHIPPING, RAILWAYS AND LAND VEHICLES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by DET NORSKE VERITAS
- Other trademarks owned by DET NORSKE VERITAS
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named DNV RISK BASED MANAGEMENT
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 2, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 31, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 16, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 21, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 1, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 30, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 29, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 24, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 18, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 2, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 5, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 25, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 2, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |