USPTO serial 75423460
JCI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HUTTON JR, WILLIAM D
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with JCI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Marta S. Levine
MARTA S LEVINE QUARLES & BRADY LLP411 E WISCONSIN AVEMILWAUKEE, WI 53202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Interior audio component parts for land vehicles, vans and trucks, namely audio speakers, surround-sound flat-panel transducers, and personal audio organizers in the nature of voice recording and playback reminder devices | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | interior structural component parts for land vehicles, vans and trucks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by JOHNSON CONTROLS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by JOHNSON CONTROLS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Hoover Universal, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Similar marks named JCI
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 22, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 23, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 9, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 3, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 8, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 3, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 4, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 22, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 14, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 4, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 4, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 11, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 10, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 28, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 26, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 4, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 17, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 26, 1999 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Feb 25, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 22, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |