USPTO serial 75424819
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Burnsville, MN
Burnsville, MN
Burnsville, MN
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Angelo N. Chaclas, Jessica L. Elliott, Charles R. Malandra, Jr., Steven J. Shapiro, Martin F. Noonan
ANGELO N CHACLAS, JESSICA L ELLIOTT, C PITNEY BOWES INC35 WATERVIEW DR STE 26-22SHELTON, CT 64848000UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Electronic payment, namely, electronic processing and transmission of bill payment data | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 22, 2008 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 23, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 23, 2004 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 23, 2004 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 19, 2001 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 20, 2001 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 20, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 17, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 16, 2001 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 19, 2000 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 14, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2000 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 23, 2000 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2000 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 7, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 9, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 23, 2000 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 16, 1999 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 20, 1999 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 23, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 1, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 30, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 23, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 23, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 19, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |