Drawing for FIRSTCOM

USPTO serial 75426785

FIRSTCOM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
THOMPSON, HEATHER
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FIRSTCOM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

DAVID J. DAVIS

DAVID J DAVIS BAKER & MCKENZIE1 PRUDENTIAL PLZ130 E RANDOLPH DRCHICAGO, IL 60601

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035on-line ordering services featuring telecommunications equipment and servicesACTIVE—
037installation of telecommunications networks and equipmentACTIVE—
038Telecommunications services, namely, long distance telephone services, local telephony services, satellite telecommunications services, private networks telecommunications services, fiber optic communications services, electronic transmission of digital voice, video and data; providing telecommunications connections to a global computer network; providing multimedia applications over a global computer network that incorporate the transmission of voice, data, facsimile, video and audio, video conferencing services; public telephone services; leasing of telecommunications equipmentACTIVE—
042web hosting services; design and integration of telecommunications networks and equipment; technical consultation in the field of telecommunicationsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 22, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 27, 2002EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Sep 3, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 28, 2002EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jul 23, 2002EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jul 17, 2002PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Mar 21, 2002PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Feb 28, 2002EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Feb 28, 2002PETLCOMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER—
Nov 17, 2001EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Aug 27, 2001EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 10, 2001EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 30, 2001PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Apr 2, 2001ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 5, 2001LEXTLATE FILED EXTENSION REQUEST—
Feb 28, 2001EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 30, 2000EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 29, 2000EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 29, 2000NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 7, 1999PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 5, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 9, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 29, 1999CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
May 3, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 12, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 24, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 22, 1998UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance