USPTO serial 75427040
WAVECOM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BAIRD, MICHAEL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WAVECOM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
92130 ISSY LES MOULINEAUX, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MICHAEL B LASKY
MICHAEL B LASKY ALTERA LAW GROUP LLC10749 BREN RD E OPUS 2MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55343UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Signal procession apparatus, namely, sub-component digital transceiver and modem cards and modules for use as an integrated sub-component within computers, terminals, automated teller machines, credit card readers and remote controllers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 25, 2000 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 21, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 21, 2000 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 30, 2000 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 21, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 1, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 10, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 6, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 8, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 8, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 12, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 26, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 24, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 24, 1998 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |