USPTO serial 75427197
WAVECOM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BAIRD, MICHAEL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WAVECOM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
92130 ISSY LES MOULINEAUX, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MICHAEL B LAKSY
MICHAEL B LASKY ALTERA LAW GROUP LLC6500 CITY W PKWYSTE 100MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55344-7701Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electrical apparatus, namely, electrical accumulators; integrated circuit data cards sold blank; blank smart cards; memory cards and parts and fittings for the aforementioned all for use as integrated sub-components within other computer based devices; telephone routing controllers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 3, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 30, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 30, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 3, 2003 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 3, 2003 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Apr 11, 2002 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 15, 2002 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 11, 2001 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 4, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 28, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 24, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 7, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 8, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 8, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 12, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 29, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 26, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 5, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 5, 1998 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |