Drawing for WALCOM

USPTO serial 75433701

WALCOM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
GEORGE, ANIL V
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with WALCOM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

GREGORY D SEELEY

GREGORY D SEELEY SEELEY SAVIDGE & AUSSEM800 BANK ONE CTR600 SUPERIOR AVECLEVELAND, OH 44114

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Rental of computer hardware to companies for employee computer training; leasing computer facilities to companies for employee computer training; registration of participants for others at computer conferences and seminars; computer consulting services to businesses for the optimum layout of office computer hardwareABANDONEDAug 19, 1995

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 13, 2002OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999
Jun 13, 2002ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION
Jan 30, 2002OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999
May 10, 2000OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999
Dec 22, 1999ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
Nov 30, 1999PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 29, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Aug 2, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jul 19, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 9, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 17, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 22, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 14, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance