USPTO serial 75435128
SMART PIPE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 3, 2004
- Examiner
- CARRUTHERS, SUE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with SMART PIPE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
New Orleans, LA
Houston, TX
New Orleans, LA
New Orleans, LA
BIRMINGHAM, AL
BIRMINGHAM, AL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROSLYN Y. BAZZELLE
ROSLYN Y. BAZZELLE RBM Law Group, PLLC2799 Katy Freeway, Suite 250HOUSTON, TX 77007United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 017 | Nonmetallic pipes and pipe liners; nonmetallic pipes for gas transmission lines; nonmetallic gas transmission lines; nonmetallic hazardous material transmission lines; nonmetallic interior linings for pipes; [ double-walled nonmetallic interior linings for pipe lines used in water and mud injection; ] nonmetallic oil and gas lines; nonmetallic saltwater lines; nonmetallic utility, sewerage and drainage lines; nonmetallic gas gathering and distribution lines, and nonmetallic industrial pipelines which require additional safeguards of monitoring, inspection, and leak detection | ACTIVE | Oct 10, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Catha, Stephen Crockett
- Other trademarks owned by SMART PIPE COMPANY, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Catha, Stephen Crockett
- Other trademarks owned by Catha, Stephen Crockett
- Other trademarks owned by SMART PPE COMPANY, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by SMART PIPE COMPANY, L.P.
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Similar marks named SMART PIPE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 30, 2024 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 30, 2024 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| May 30, 2024 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| May 17, 2024 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 4, 2024 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 7, 2023 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 7, 2023 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 7, 2023 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 3, 2023 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2014 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2014 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Aug 18, 2014 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Aug 13, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 28, 2014 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 5, 2014 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 22, 2010 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 22, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 7, 2010 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 5, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 3, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 24, 2003 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 19, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 18, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 7, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 30, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2003 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jun 9, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| May 5, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 30, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 1, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 29, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 20, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 3, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 30, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 30, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 11, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 27, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 8, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 7, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 13, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 12, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 20, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 17, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 2, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 30, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |