USPTO serial 75435613
DECO-WRAP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SAITO, KIM
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DECO-WRAP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 026 | fabric for use in the manufacture of clothing, lace trimming, embroidery, braids for or as clothing accessories, ribbons as clothing accessories, ribbons for wrappings and decorations, bows for gift wrapping, ornamental bows of textile for decoration, tassels, metallic yarns, fancy yarns and embroidery yarns for knittings and/or embroidering clothing, buttons for clothing, ornamental novelty buttons, embroidered emblems, clothing buckles not of precious metals, namely, shoe buckles, hair buckles and belt buckles, elastic webbing for clothing and shoes, needles for knitting, needles for knitting machines, needles for sewing, sewing boxes, eyelets for clothing, pins for hats and bonnets, head and hair decorations and adornments, namely, hair bands, hair bows, hair buckles, and hair ornaments, artificial beards, artificial mustaches, hair pieces and toupees, wigs, non-electrical hair curlers, shoe decorations not of precious metal, namely, shoe ornaments, shoe eyelets, shoe laces, artificial flowers, artificial wreaths, and shuttles for making fishing nets | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 23, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 12, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 28, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |