USPTO serial 75435614
RIBBONISM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SAITO, KIM
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RIBBONISM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 026 | Lace trimming, embroidery, braids for or as clothing accessories, ribbons as clothing accessories, ribbons for wrapping and decorations, bows for gift wrapping, ornamental bows of textile for decoration, tassels, buttons for clothing ornamental novelty buttons, embroidered emblems, clothing buckles not of precious metals, namely, shoe buckles, hair buckles and belt buckles, elastic webbing for clothing and shoes, needles for knitting, needles for knitting machines, needles for sewing, sewing boxes, eyelets for clothing, pins for hats and bonnets, head and hair decorations and adornments, namely, hair bands, hair bows, hair buckles, and hair ornaments, artificial beards, artificial mustaches, hair pieces and toupees, wigs, non-electrical hair curlers, shoe decorations not of precious metal, namely shoe ornaments, shoe eyelets, shoe laces, artificial flowers, artificial wreaths, and shuttles for making fishing nets | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 23, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 15, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 28, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 15, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 11, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 19, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 26, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 6, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 6, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 5, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 6, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 4, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 25, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 12, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 28, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |