Drawing for ENDOSURGE

USPTO serial 75435848

ENDOSURGE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
KIM, YONG OH
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ENDOSURGE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010surgical instruments for use in endosurgical procedures, namely, laser guards, graspers, uterine manipulators, irrigation suction devices, trocars, barrier devices, and surgical devices for use in endosurgical procedures consisting of cauterization equipment and digital video equipmentACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 13, 2003PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED
Sep 25, 2002PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED
Sep 12, 2002ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 25, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
May 20, 2002PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
May 20, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Aug 20, 2001EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Apr 3, 2001EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Jan 16, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 24, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 22, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jun 29, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 30, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 29, 1999CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 21, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 21, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 28, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance