USPTO serial 75436555
CURE-TEK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2775914Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 21, 2003
- Examiner
- RADEMACHER, APRIL LUEDERS
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CURE-TEK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Georgetown, Ontario, CA
Georgetown, Ontario, CA
Georgetown, Ontario, CA
GEORGETOWN, ONTARIO, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | infrared curing system comprised of infrared lights and elements, stands, controls and switching units therefor | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 30, 1994 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by H & S AUTOSHOT, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by H & S AUTOSHOT, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by H & S AUTOSHOT, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by H & S AUTOSHOT MFG. CO. LTD.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named CURE-TEK
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 3, 2024 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Oct 21, 2022 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2013 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2013 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Oct 24, 2013 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Oct 24, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 21, 2013 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2013 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 18, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Nov 17, 2009 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Nov 11, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Nov 9, 2009 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2009 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 3, 2009 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Nov 2, 2009 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 20, 2009 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 21, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 3, 2003 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 3, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 29, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 14, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 29, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2003 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Apr 18, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 29, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 28, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 6, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 31, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 29, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 19, 2001 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 19, 2001 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 14, 2001 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 16, 2001 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 3, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 20, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 16, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 16, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 16, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 14, 2000 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 13, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 2, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |