USPTO serial 75437649
MINNESOTA WILD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 17, 2003
- Examiner
- MULLEN, MARK
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MINNESOTA WILD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas H. Prochnow
Thomas H. Prochnow NHL Enterprises, L.P.1185 Avenue of the AmericasNew York, NY 10036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Potpourri and Sachets | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 24, 1991 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Minnesota Specialty Crops, Incorporated
- Other trademarks owned by Minnesota Specialty Crops, Incorporated
- Other trademarks owned by MINNESOTA WILD HOCKEY CLUB, L.P.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named MINNESOTA WILD
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 8, 2014 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jan 24, 2014 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Sep 29, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 29, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 6, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 12, 2004 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 15, 2003 | RRPR | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION | — |
| Sep 15, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 29, 2003 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Jul 1, 2003 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 17, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 8, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 8, 2003 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 31, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 26, 2000 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 16, 2000 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 1, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 30, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 30, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 30, 1999 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 7, 1999 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 18, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 18, 1999 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 12, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 13, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 3, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 20, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 15, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 9, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |