Drawing for DENOVUS OUT OF THE NEW

USPTO serial 75437672

DENOVUS OUT OF THE NEW

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
LEVINE, HOWARD B
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with DENOVUS OUT OF THE NEW?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Adhesives for use in the manufacture or repair of pipes, piping, and fixtures; epoxy containing foams for use in the manufacture or repair of piping and fixtures all in the field of industrial and military applicationsACTIVEOct 1, 1997
002Corrosion resistant coatings for use on nuts, bolts, pins, screws, and fasteners, piping and fixtures, and injection molding, all in the field of industrial and military applicationsACTIVEOct 1, 1997
017Adhesives and caulking compounds for use on nuts, bolts, pins, screws, and fasteners, piping and fixtures, in the field of industrial and military applicationsACTIVEOct 1, 1997

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 12, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 10, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 10, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 9, 2005CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 16, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Sep 2, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 30, 2004SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE
Aug 19, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Aug 2, 2004IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED
Aug 2, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Feb 19, 2004FAXXFAX RECEIVED
Feb 10, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 17, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 17, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Aug 15, 2001IUCNNOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED
Jul 3, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 17, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 4, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Oct 31, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Oct 24, 2000CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED
May 8, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 23, 1999CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 22, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 9, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 5, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 1, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance