USPTO serial 75437843
BOMBA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TURNER, JASON FITZGERALD
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BOMBA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
EUGENE R SAWALL
EUGENE R SAWALL ANDRUS SCEALES STARKE & SAWALL LLP100 E WISCONSIN AVEMILWAUKEE, WI 53202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | Nonalcoholic beverages, namely, mineral water, carbonated water; and other alcohol-free beverages, namely, fruit juice beverages, fruit flavored soft drinks, sport drinks, sport drinks with electrolytes; fruit juice beverages, fruit flavored soft drinks, sport drinks, sport drinks with electrolytes; concentrates, syrups and powders for the preparation of soft drinks, and all the aforesaid with the addition of mineral aggregates and vitamins | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 23, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 23, 2007 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 23, 2007 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 7, 2007 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 18, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 17, 2005 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 17, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 27, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 26, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 24, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 22, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 13, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 10, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 10, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 2, 2004 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 2, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 9, 2004 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 3, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 13, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 7, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 28, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 9, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 16, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 16, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 12, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 1, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 11, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 8, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 7, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 12, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 2, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |