Drawing for OPERATIONAL FILTER

USPTO serial 75438407

OPERATIONAL FILTER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
GASKINS, TONJA M
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OPERATIONAL FILTER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009frequency-selective analog circuitsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 29, 2003ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
May 21, 2003EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Feb 20, 2003EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF
Sep 23, 2002CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED
Jun 17, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 8, 2002CNRUDISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE MAILED
May 8, 2002AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE
Feb 19, 2002JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Feb 19, 2002EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Feb 14, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 13, 2002IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED
Aug 8, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 22, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 17, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 15, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 31, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 19, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 26, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 5, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance