USPTO serial 75438592
COSMO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BORSUK, ESTHER
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with COSMO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ANDREW V GALWAY
ANDREW V GALWAY OSTROLENK FABER GERB & SOFFEN LLP1180 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036-8403UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | personal organizers and trays filled with an assortment of cosmetics, namely, lip sticks and face powder | ACTIVE | — |
| 008 | hair cutting shears and scissors; non-electric hair clippers | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | cosmetic mirrors and empty plastic pill boxes | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | tooth brush holders; soap dishes; unfilled personal care organizers and trays; hair brushes; hair combs; plastic toiletry containers for domestic and household use; soap dispensers; hair combs for dressing | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | shower caps | ACTIVE | — |
| 026 | hair bands, hair elastics, pony tail holders; hair pins; bobbie pins; hairnets; and ornamenting hair rollers, clamps, clips and rods | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Hearst Corporation, The
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 026
- Similar marks named COSMO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5, 2004 | FAXX | FAX SENT | — |
| Oct 4, 2004 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 4, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 3, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 10, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 22, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 11, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 27, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 31, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 31, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 31, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 13, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 29, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 26, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 23, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 4, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 2, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |