USPTO serial 75438803
HEMP NUT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CRAWFORD, MARY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HEMP NUT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LARRY D JOHNSON
CRAIG M. STAINBROOK JOHNSON & STAINBROOK, LLP3550 ROUND BARN BLVD.SUITE 203SANTA ROSA, CA 95403Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 031 | processed edible hempseeds | ACTIVE | Aug 7, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 6, 2008 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 6, 2008 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 24, 2008 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 24, 2008 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 17, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 17, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 30, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 30, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 9, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 3, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 8, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 23, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 10, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 28, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 14, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 9, 2000 | CRTP | REG. CANCELLED - RESTORED TO PENDENCY | — |
| Apr 11, 2000 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 1, 1999 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 28, 1999 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 9, 1999 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 13, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 11, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 8, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 26, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 21, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 1, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 29, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 10, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 1, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |